EccUntitled (214 X 616 Px) (2)

Opportunity space

Future Proofing Our Climate and Weather

Exploring Climate Cooling

This £56.8m programme aims to build a robust evidence base to explore – with independent oversight – if climate cooling approaches could ever be feasible, scalable, safe, and governable.

Programme oversight + governance

We’re committed to responsible stewardship, transparency, accountability + good governance. All funded research in this programme must comply with the following governance principles:

  • Deliver valuable + transformational knowledge. We aim to select and design for research that will address the most pressing critical scientific questions surrounding approaches for actively cooling the climate.
  • Minimise risk. All experiments should be designed to reduce direct risk as far as possible.
  • Engage with, and respect key communities.
  • Communicate proactively and be transparent, open, and honest at both the programme and project level, including around levels and sources of funding, intentions, how the research is conducted, outputs, and impacts.
  • Be cognisant of the broader implications of research + integrate systems thinking into research on approaches for actively cooling the climate.
  • Learn, adapt and be responsive. Success will require a willingness to adapt to lessons learned during the programme and to changing circumstances. 
A photo of Mark Symes presenting at an event.

Our goal is to build the open and objective scientific knowledge base the world needs to make better-informed decisions.

To ensure this, all our funded teams have signed a binding Intellectual Property (IP) Pledge. This legal commitment ensures:

  • All experimental data is made public for scrutiny by the global scientific community.

  • All patents are free for research. Any team member must provide a royalty-free licence for anyone to use their patents for research purposes.

Read the full IP pledge

Oversight Committee


To ensure rigorous and responsible governance, this programme benefits from an independent Oversight Committee composed of international experts and co-chaired by Professors Piers Forster and Jessica Seddon. The Committee advises ARIA leadership and plays a crucial role in scrutinising outdoor experiment plans, providing expert recommendations, and may advise against funding experiments unless certain modifications are made. While ultimate funding decisions rest with ARIA, the Oversight Committee has the authority to comment publicly and independently on experiment funding decisions and on other matters related to the programme and the wider field.

The committee focuses on:

  • Supporting effective oversight of the programme's outdoor experiments and guiding transparent communication of findings.

  • Shaping international norms and standards for the responsible governance of such experiments.

  • Contributing constructively to the wider international discussion on potential governance mechanisms for climate cooling approaches.

Learn more about the Committee's remit, members, and work

 

Headshot of Ivan Jayapurna

Ivan Jayapurna

Programme Director

Ivan joined ARIA from the University of California, Berkeley, with a PhD in materials science and engineering. While studying, Ivan co-led several tech spinout efforts, was twice funded by the National Science Foundation I-Corps, and co-founded a technical consultancy for biotech startups.

Alexsmith

Alex Smith

Programme Specialist

Alex is a project management professional with experience in complex transformations. He recently streamlined national public service infrastructure for the Nursing and Midwifery Council and has led strategic initiatives at the London School of Economics, including delivering programmes, establishing governance and replacing legacy systems. Alex supports ARIA as an operating partner from Pace.

Jose Videira 1

José Videira

Technical Specialist

José has been working in deeptech startups since the age of 15, with a core interest in materials integration and manufacturing resilience. He spent 8 years in a startup he co-founded, taking a dual-use material technology from TRL 0 to 6, and driving the deployment of physics-based AI/ML into production lines. He has a PhD in solid state physics from Imperial College London.

Headshot of Ivan Jayapurna

Ivan Jayapurna

Programme Director

Ivan joined ARIA from the University of California, Berkeley, with a PhD in materials science and engineering. While studying, Ivan co-led several tech spinout efforts, was twice funded by the National Science Foundation I-Corps, and co-founded a technical consultancy for biotech startups.

Alexsmith

Alex Smith

Programme Specialist

Alex is a project management professional with experience in complex transformations. He recently streamlined national public service infrastructure for the Nursing and Midwifery Council and has led strategic initiatives at the London School of Economics, including delivering programmes, establishing governance and replacing legacy systems. Alex supports ARIA as an operating partner from Pace.

Jose Videira 1

José Videira

Technical Specialist

José has been working in deeptech startups since the age of 15, with a core interest in materials integration and manufacturing resilience. He spent 8 years in a startup he co-founded, taking a dual-use material technology from TRL 0 to 6, and driving the deployment of physics-based AI/ML into production lines. He has a PhD in solid state physics from Imperial College London.

Resources

Real IceCommunity engagement summary, Winter 2025/26 [PDF - 484.73Kb]Nunavut Impact Review Board’s screening report [PDF - 379.95Kb]Scientific research licence for experiments from the Nunavut Research Institute [PDF - 908.81Kb]
Arctic ReflectionsCommunity engagement summary, Winter 2025/6 [PDF - 1.12Mb]Nunavut Impact Review Board’s screening report [PDF - 534.29Kb]Scientific research licence for experiments from the Nunavut Research Institute [PDF - 851.53Kb]
Oversight + scrutinyRASI: Oversight Committee's full recommendation (9 December 2025) [PDF - 151.07Kb]RASI: Reply from and the CEO's formal decision letter (18 December 2025) [PDF - 94.91Kb]

We prioritise transparency, public engagement, and risk minimisation. Project teams planning an outdoor experiment must navigate a formal, multi-stage approval process. This ensures no funding for an outdoor experiment is released without rigorous technical analysis and meaningful community engagement. Here are the key stages:

The Creator experience

What you can expect as an ARIA R&D creator

Learn more

Applicant guidance

Discover the process of applying for ARIA funding and find key resources

Learn more
_